How many of you know, Intel seems always one step ahead when it comes to AMD CPU. Everyone says "Intel-AMD-If the _____( fill your password here)". But is this really true?
Just a few years, AMD has given Intel kicks Butt with their own new dual-core processors, the Athlon X2. They have a length ahead of Intel in the days when Intel still on the Pentium series, and each had an AMD CPU. AMD, and Intel seems Ping Slip Away.
But two years ago, Intel AMD area with its own series dual-core CPU, Intel Core processor 2nd Well, that was a big monster, but the devil proposed virtually all CPU AMD. From overclocking possibilities with the processing, Intel Core 2 left of the AMD CPU in the dust. Since Intel has always one step ahead AMD, whether from quad-core CPU in 45nm development of the CPU.
See, Intel seems much better than AMD? But that’s not the whole truth. Intel CPU AMD CPU, the certain criteria, but when it comes to a processor Intel and AMD CPU side by side with the default settings, they are actually very similar. Remember, the figures do not tell the whole truth. It is as graphic cards: You have the largest number in your group, but you not noticed that many of the difference between the two screens. Even with the CPU, Intel over AMD when it comes to overclocking and other standard settings, but when it comes to raw materials performance in the camp settings, specific CPU AMD makes the Intel CPU.
So, why is it that everyone thinks that Intel is so good that AMD? Mainly because of the marketing, and the media. We are all influenced by the media without, and unless that someone enough attention is a CPU, Intel and AMD CPU benchmark on the other hand, nobody is apercevra.
Leave a Reply